Formaðurin í Fiskimannafelagnum , Jan Højgaard, sigur at tað neyvan ber til at tryggja seg ímóti at fiskur endar aftur í havinum.
 
- Tú kanst ikki tryggja teg ímóti at fiskur endar aftur í havinum. Tá tað rullar er ikki ókent at fiskur kann av óvart rulla aftur eftir bondunum og fara yvir borð. Eingin kastar góðan fisk út, men tað eru av og á støður har fiskur kann enda aftur í havinum. Men vit hava als ikki nakra ábending um at hetta er nakað sum er ein stórur trupuleiki.
 
Fari at tosað við skiparan
Tá vit tosaðu við reiðaran, Hanus Hansen, í gjárkvøldi segði hann at hann fekk ikki gjørt viðmerkingar til málið fyrr enn hann hevði havt møguleika at tosað við skiparan á Nærabergi um støðuna.
Í tíðindasending í KVF í dag var Hanus Hansen siteraður fyri at siga at tað skal eingin fiskur kastast út frá Nærabergi.

Sí HER
 
Eingin pelagiskur fiskur útblakaður í Føroyum
 
Sambært ” ICES WGWIDE REPORT 2018”  stendur at lesa á síðu 300, at eingin pelagiskur fiskur endar í havinum, men sambært deildarleiðaranum í Vørn, Jóhan Simonsen kunnu tey á Vørn ikki siga at eingin fiskur endar í havinum.
 
- Vit hava eitt mál við júst Nærabergi sum enn er í rættinum og sum fór fram í 2018. Og nú hava vit so eitt video sum vísir at talan er um útblaking. Men tað er ikki gjørligt at staðfesta hvussu nógv talan er um.

Spurdur um hví tað sambært ICES ikki eru tøl sum vísa útblaking av uppisjóvarfiski í Føroyum og Føroyar tí eru skrásettar fyri ”0” ikki at blaka ein tann einasta uppisjóvarfisk í havið, sigur hann at tað er trupult at skilja, men at VØRN annars ikki samskiftir við ICES og vísir til Havstovuna.
 
Vit fingu ikki fatur á stjóranum á Havstovuni, men vit fingu tó at vita, at Havstovan ikki hevur havt nøkur tøl um útblaking kring Føroyar og tí fáa teir ikki upplýst ICES at nøkur útblaking er.
 
----
 
Brot úr ” ICES WGWIDE REPORT 2018” frá ICES:
 
 
7.1.2 Estimates of discards
Discard data are available since 2000 for few countries. Until 2013 however the esti- mates available are considered an underestimation of the overall amount. (Figure 7.1.2.1)
In 2017 most countries have presented discard information. Countries that reported discard for horse mackerel were Spain, Denmark, France, Sweden, UK (England + Wales) and Scotland. 2017 discard for Germany, Ireland, Netherland, Norway and Faroe Island is considered equal to zero. Discard rate for western horse mackerel was equal to 3 926 tonnes, equal to 4.3 % in weight of the total catches.
Discard data are included in the assessment as part of the total catches. Length frequency distributions of discard were provided by Spain and France…
 

….. Estimates of discarding or slipping are either not available or incomplete for most countries. Anecdotal evidence suggests that discarding and slipping can occur for a number of reasons including high-grading (larger fish attract a premium price), lack of quota, storage or processing capacity and when mackerel is taken as by-catch.
 
·  Confidential information suggests substantial under-reported landings for which numerical information is not available for most countries. Recent work has indicated considerable uncertainty in true catch figures (Sim- monds et al., 2010) for the period studied.
 
·  Estimates of the magnitude and precision of unaccounted mortality sug- gests that, on average for the period prior up to 2007, total catch related re- movals were equivalent to 1.7 to 3.6 times the reported catch (Simmonds et al., 2010).
 
·  Reliance on logbook data from EU countries implies (even with 100% com- pliance) a precision of recorded landings of 89% from 2004 and 82% previ- ous to this (Council Regulation (EC) Nos. 2807/83 & 2287/2003). Given that over reporting of mackerel landings is unlikely for economic reasons; the WG considers that the reported landings may be an underestimate of up to 18% (11% from 2004), based on logbook figures. Where inspections were not carried out there is a possibility of a 56% under reporting, without there be- ing an obvious illegal record in the logsheets. Without information on the percentage of the landings inspected it is not possible for the Working Group to evaluate the underestimate in its figures due to this technicality. EU landings represent about 65% of the total estimated NEA mackerel catch.
 
·  The accuracy of logbooks from countries outside the EU has not been eval- uated by WGWIDE. Monitoring of logbook records is the responsibility of the national control and enforcement agencies.
 
All discarding is prohibited for Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese vessels

Sí meira her